No cause for alarm
Recently, I have been regretting using our real names on the blog. I know that you can unknowingly give away too much info and that can be a bit dangerous, security-wise. I have a large pool of nick-names to draw from (at least in the case of my children), but I just didn't use them. After some consideration, I've decided to start using pseudonyms, at least in the case of my children: Mimi, Buddy, and Sweetsa-pizza. I'm stil trying to come up with some for me and the hubby. So here is an open call for suggestions.
posted by B at 2:58 PM
7 Comments:
B is too personally identifiable? Man, look what a cyber world we've become! ;-)
I guess if you have to change yours, maybe we need to change ours, since we use single letters too.
OK, OK, wiseguys, I forget that "B" is not really personally identifying ...it's been my nickname for a long time, I guess it seems as personal as the "real" thing.
I think B and D would work just fine!
We have used shorthand notations:
R, Sh, L, P, D, B, S, C, A, and E.
Now 10.2 has planted a seed: 9, 9w or 9s, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, and 9.9. In this case, the reference is 9.
What about N?
B, I am leery of even posting a blog, let alone using real names, but kinda dumb that I use real names in my comments, huh?
As for letters and numbers to represent family members... you guys crack me up! I can't wait to see you in about a week!
Also, I have debated about this next baby's name, because he may end up with the same initials as Aun... uh, I mean our child #1. That would sure throw the letter system off.
Post a Comment
<< Home